DA lodges complaints against Mashatile and Mbalula with Public Protector.

By Lehlohonolo Lehana.

@GalloImages.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) has asked the acting Public Protector, Kholeka Gcaleka to investigate Deputy President Paul Mashatile and ANC General Secretary Fikile Mbalula.

The complaint against Mashatile emanates from News24 report, which claimed the deputy president lives a life of luxury in expensive homes, owned by businesspeople who benefitted from state contracts.

The homes used by Mashatile include one owned by controversial businessman Edwin Sodi, who is facing charges related to the Free State asbestos scandal.

Mbalula, now the ANC’s secretary general, apparently received an R3 million loan from the wife of a former National Lotteries Commission COO when he was still sports minister.

DA national spokesperson Solly Malatsi says these allegations raise serious concerns about potential breaches of the Executive Members Ethics Act, and the constitution.

“We request that a thorough investigation be conducted to determine the veracity of these claims and ascertain whether any impropriety or prejudice to state affairs or public administration has occurred.”

“The scope of the investigation should encompass various aspects, including but not limited to:  Whether Mbalula received a loan from Upbrand, and if these funds originated from the National Lotteries Commission; The nature and details of contractual agreements involving individuals and companies allegedly involved in corruption related to the National Lotteries Commission;

“Whether Mbalula, Upbrand, the National Lotteries Commission, or any other parties involved in the deal conducted themselves in a manner that is improper or resulted in impropriety or prejudice to state affairs or public administration; or any other parties involved in the deal engaged in potentially corrupt activities under the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act; and  Whether Mbalula may have breached any provisions of the Executive Ethics Code in relation to this deal, including any potential conflict of interest or improper enrichment.”

He adds that the investigation into Mashatile should explore the allegations of impropriety surrounding his lifestyle, connections with tenderpreneurs, and the use of properties linked to individuals facing corruption charges.

“This inquiry should examine whether Mr Mashatile violated the Executive Members Ethics Act, provisions of the constitution, or any other relevant legal framework.

“We firmly believe that a comprehensive investigation by the Office of the Public Protector is essential to uphold the integrity of our democracy and ensure transparency and accountability in public affairs.”

Scroll to Top